Showing posts with label Attorney Pamela Magnano. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Attorney Pamela Magnano. Show all posts

Friday, February 7, 2014

Divorce and Taxes

There are many issues to consider when negotiating a divorce agreement, but most people do not consider all of the implications a divorce can have on your taxes.  When preparing to enter into a divorce agreement, you should consider whether certain exemptions/deductions should be addressed in your divorce agreement.  Parents should have an agreement on who claims the children for the dependency exemption.  Additionally, you should speak to your accountant about the IRS rules regarding claiming the child care credit and the child tax credit.   In addition, if you own a home, your agreement should be clear on who gets to claim the taxes and interest associated with this ownership. 
When analyzing whether or not an agreement is in your best interest, it is important to not only know your weekly disposable income but also what you can expect when tax season approaches.  We encourage our clients to work with their accountants and our attorneys to maximize the benefits that they may receive when filing their taxes.  At Flaherty Legal Group, LLC we believe it is important to consult professionals that can assist us and you in making the best decisions.
Attorney Pamela Magnano of Flaherty Legal Group. Divorce and Family Law Attorney West Hartford, Connecticut.
Attorney Pamela Magnano of Flaherty Legal Group, LLC
Attorney Pamela Magnano practices Divorce and Family Law with James Flaherty and Sandi Girolamo at Flaherty Legal Group, LLC in West Hartford, CT.

Facebook Twitter Linked In Google Plus

AV Rated - James Flaherty and Pamela Magnano 

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Attorney Magnano Selected to New Leaders in the Law 2013


Attorney Pamela Magnano of Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, Connecticut.  Attorney Magnano practices divorce and family law with James Flaherty.
Attorney Pamela Magnano
We would like to congratulate Attorney Pam Magnano on her selection to the Connecticut Law Tribune's New Leaders in the Law for 2013. Out of nearly 300 of the best and brightest nominees, Pam was one of 60 attorneys to receive the honor.  Attorney Magnano will be recognized in the New Leaders in the Law 2013 yearbook published by the Law Tribune, and will receive an award at the New Leaders in the Law awards dinner on November 7th.  Of the many qualifications that led to Pam's selection, notable examples include her innovative and determined approach to family law, as well as a dedication to service best exemplified by her volunteer work on the board of directors of the Children's Law Center


Connecticut Law Tribune Logo in blog post announcing Attorney Pamela Magnano as on of the New Leaders in the Law for 2013.        


Attorney Pamela Magnano practices divorce and family law with 

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Matthew Gauruder Memorial Scholarship Golf Tournament

Attorney Pam Magnano and Flaherty Legal Group sponsored a tee at the 9th Annual Golf Tournament in memory of Matthew Gauruder.
Through continued support over the past eight years, almost $100,000 has been donated to the Matthew Gauruder Memorial Scholarship Fund at Rockville High School in Rockville, CT. Scholarships have been awarded to 41 students since its inception in 2002. 
The tournament takes place on the 3rd Monday in August at Topstone Golf Course in South Windsor, CT.  


Flaherty Legal Group Tee Sponsor at Matthew Gauruder Memorial Scholoarship Golf Tournament

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Supreme Court Rules On Same Sex Marriage Cases

On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued rulings on the two cases involving same sex marriages.  In a 5-4 decision on the case of United States v. Windsor,133 S.Ct. 2675 (2013), the Court overturned a law that denied federal benefits to couples in same sex marriages.  This means that couples in same sex marriages will be afforded the same rights to these benefits as couples in heterosexual marriages.  It is important to note that this case deals with extending federal benefits to couples in states where same sex marriages are allowed and does not extend the right to marry to states where it is not currently allowed.  In issuing this decision, Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority found that the Defense ofMarriage Act (“DOMA”; 1 U.S.C.A. § 7) is invalid because it denies same sex couples the rights that the states intended them to have by allowing them to marry and violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the Constitution.  The decision in this case will have an impact on same sex divorce cases throughout the country, including here in Connecticut.DOMA instructs all federal officials, and indeed all persons with whom same-sex couples interact, including their own children, that their marriage is less worthy than the marriages of others.


The Supreme Court also decided to act on the case of Hollingsworth v. Perry, 133 S.Ct.2652 (2013), claiming that the supporters who argued for the ban on same sex marriages imposed by California’s Proposition 8 had no legal standing to bring the case.  In refusing to decide this case, the California trial court’s decision striking down Proposition 8 still stands.

Attorney Pamela Magnano practices divorce and family law with Attorney James Flaherty at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, CT
Attorney Pamela Magnano

Attorney Pam Magnano practices divorce and family law at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, CT.  She first wrote about this topic in a March 2013 post titled "Same Sex Marriage and The US Supreme Court". 
Contact Attorney Magnano by calling 860-904-2034 ext. 3

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Prenuptial Agreements

Many people chose to enter into prenuptial agreements prior to getting married.  A question that is often asked by our clients is:  will this agreement be valid if I divorce?  Prenuptial agreements (sometimes referred to as antenuptial agreements) are reviewed on a case by case basis.  However, there are some items that can help you determine if your prenuptial agreement will be valid.
The date that the agreement was entered into is an important factor in determining how the Court will decide its validity.   On October 1, 1995, Connecticut General Statutes § 46b-36g went into effect.  This statute governs the enforcement of premarital agreements made on or after October 1, 1995.  The statute provides that a premarital agreement will not be enforced if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves:  (1) it was not executed voluntarily; (2) it was unconscionable at the time it was signed or the time it is sought to be enforced; (3) the party was not provided with fair and reasonable disclosure of the other parties’ assets and income; (4) the party was not afforded an opportunity to consult with counsel.  Agreements entered into prior to October 1, 1995 are governed by the three prong test (pp 15) established in the case of McHugh v.McHugh, 181 Conn. 482 (1980).  The three prong test established by the McHugh Court provided that prenuptial agreements would be enforceable if: (1) the contract was validly entered into; (2) its terms do not violate public policy; (3) the circumstances of the parties at the time the marriage is dissolved are not so beyond the contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was entered into as to cause its enforcement to work injustice.  Id. at 485-486.
The Court in Crews v. Crews,295 Conn. 153 (2010) elaborated on the third prong in the McHugh case.  The Crews Court found that “to render unenforceable an otherwise valid antenuptial agreement, a court must determine: (1) the parties’ intent and circumstances when they signed the antenuptial agreement; (2) the circumstances of the parties at the time of the dissolution of the marriage; (3) whether those circumstances are ‘so far beyond’ the contemplation of the parties at the time of execution; and (4) if the circumstances are beyond the parties’ initial contemplation, whether enforcement would cause an injustice.”  Id. at 168.  The burden of proving these elements is on the person seeking to enforce the agreement.  This clarification in Crews makes the issue of whether or not an otherwise valid agreement will be enforceable very case specific. 
For Prenuptial Agreements entered into on or after October 1, 1995, the Court will make its determination regarding validity by analyzing the four factors listed in C.G.S. § 46b-36g.  It is important to note that a party seeking to have the prenuptial agreement deemed unenforceable does not have to prove all four factors.  For example, the Agreement may have been entered into voluntarily but if the party can show that he/she was not provided with fair and reasonable disclosure of the other parties’ assets and income, the Agreement will deemed unenforceable.  Similar to the Agreements entered into prior to October 1, 1995, the analysis of whether or not to enforce a prenuptial agreement is very case specific. 
Regardless of whether your case will be examined under the three prong test outlined in McHugh or whether it will be governed by the statute, your attorney will need specific information concerning your circumstances both at the time of the execution of the agreement as well as at the time of divorce in order to help you determine if the agreement will be enforceable. You should make sure you provide your attorney with an accurate, signed copy of the prenuptial agreement and copies of any correspondence leading up to the execution of the same.  You should also bring copies of any financial disclosures that were made by either party prior to signing the agreement if they are not already attached to the prenuptial agreement.

Attorney Pamela Magnano practices with Attorney James T. Flaherty at Flaherty Legal Group, LLC in West Hartford, CT.  Magnano and Flaherty practice divorce and family law, including prenuptial agreements.
Attorney Pamela Magnano
Attorney Pamela Magnano practices Divorce and Family Law with Attorney James T. Flaherty and Attorney Sandi B. Girolamo at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, CT.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Ten Grounds For Divorce In Connecticut

DID YOU KNOW?
In Connecticut, you only need to prove an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage to obtain a divorce.  In the event you wish to allege another ground, there are ten (10) grounds for divorce listed in Connecticut General Statutes §46b-40.  These ten grounds are:
1. Irretrievable breakdown of marriage;
2. Living apart due to incompatibility for a continuous period of 18 months and there is no prospect of reconciliation;
3. Adultery;
4. Fraudulent contract;
5. Willful desertion for one year;
6. Seven years’ absence;
7. Habitual intemperance;
8. Intolerable cruelty;
9. Sentence to imprisonment for life or the commission of any infamous crime involving a violation of conjugal duty and punishable by imprisonment for a period in excess of one year;
10. Legal confinement in a hospital or institution because of mental illness.
The court may enter a dissolution of a marriage upon a finding that any of the above has occurred.

For a general overview about divorce, please refer to our four part series of articles on the Flaherty Legal Group Blog titled "DIVORCE: Basics - Money - Process - Parenting".  

Attorney James Flaherty of Flaherty Legal Group and Attorneys Pamela Magnano and Sandi Girolamo practice divorce and family law in West Hartford, CT
Attorney Pamela Magnano practices Divorce and Family Law with Attorney James Flaherty 
and Attorney Sandi Girolamo at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, CT.





Thursday, March 28, 2013

Same Sex Marriage and The US Supreme Court


The United States Supreme Court heard arguments this week on two cases involving same sex marriages.  These cases deal with the rights and benefits of same sex couples to wed and receive benefits.  It is anticipated that the Supreme Court will make a ruling on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) which legally defines a spouse as a person of the opposite sex.  (1 U.S.C.A. § 7).  Under DOMA, federal protections and provisions such as Social Security, bankruptcy benefits, and family medical leave protections do not apply to same sex couples.  This is true even if the state in which the couple resides allows for same sex marriage.  One of the cases being heard involves a lesbian woman challenging the fact that she had to pay more in estate taxes when her spouse died because the marriage was not recognized under DOMA even though their home state of New York recognized the marriage.  (See United States v. Edith SchlainWindsor, In Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al.SC Docket No. 12-307).  The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals determined that DOMA is unconstitutional and violates the equal protection clause.  
The second case before the Supreme Court deals with California’s Proposition 8 which bans same sex marriage.  (See Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., v. Kristin M. Perry, et al. SCDocket No. 12-144).  The issue before the Court is whether the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection prevents states from refusing marriage to a defined class of people.  The ruling of the high Court on this issue could impact laws all across the United States.  In the United States, nine states allow same sex marriage. See a breakdown of the numbers provided by CNN.  Connecticut is among the nine states that do allow same sex marriage.
Attorney Pamela Magnano practices divorce and family law with Attorney James T. Flaherty at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, Connecticut
Attorney Pamela Magnano practices divorce and family law at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, CT with Attorney James Flaherty and Attorney Sandi Girolamo


Thursday, February 14, 2013

Did you know? Same Sex Marriage


Same sex marriages are treated differently than heterosexual marriages.  The State of Connecticut recognizes these marriages and affords same sex spouses the same privileges as heterosexual spouses when it comes to medical benefits, retirement benefits and taxes.  However, the Federal Government does not apply the same standards as the State of Connecticut.  This difference means that additional paperwork may need to be prepared in order for you to have protections while married.  Also, in the event of divorce, there are many traps and consequences that can occur if you are not careful.
See more of Attorney Magnano's coverage on same sex marriage by clicking here.
Attorney Pamela Magnano practices divorce and family law with Attorney James Flaherty at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, Connecticut.  She blogs about topics including same sex marriage.
Attorney Pamela Magnano practices family law with Attorneys James Flaherty and Sandi Girolamo at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, Connecticut. The firm provides legal counsel for most family law matters.  If you have questions or are seeking legal counsel pertaining to same sex marriage, please contact us at (860)-904-2034.


Did you know? TECHNOLOGY & LEGAL RESEARCH

The practice of family law has changed significantly due to changes in technology.  The practitioner that once had to spend hours in the library researching issues can now have multiple information sources at the touch of a button.  Today, most law offices have a web-based legal research program.  Two common programs are provided by Westlaw and LexisNexis.  However, the practitioner can also access cases through the State of Connecticut Judicial Website and the Connecticut Bar Association WebsiteFlaherty Legal Group utilizes these search engines to provide its clients with the most up to date case law for every issue impacting family law.  Because of these tools, our attorneys can more quickly and efficiently find effective information.  Our clients benefit from quality research that is more cost effective.

Attorney Pamela Magnano and Flaherty Legal Group utilize the technological resources available to their practice which include Westlaw and Lexis Nexis.

Attorney Pamela Magnano and Attorney James Flaherty of Flaherty Legal Group practice divorce and family law in Connecticut.
Attorney Pamela M. Magnano practices divorce and family law with Attorneys James T. Flaherty and Sandi Girolamo at Flaherty Legal Group, LLC in West Hartford, Connecticut..




Thursday, January 31, 2013

Attorney Pamela Magnano and the Children's Law Center


Attorney Pamela M. Magnano serves on the Board of Directors for the Children’s Law Center of Connecticut (“CLC”).  In addition to being a member of the Board of Directors, Attorney Magnano also serves as co-chair for the CLC’s annual Gala. 

Attorney Pamela Magnano sits on the board of directors of the Children's Law Center in Connecticut.  The Children’s Law Center is the only organization in the state that provides legal advocates to indigent children in contentious family court cases.  The staff attorneys for the CLC take on cases that are complex and high conflict.  The CLC strives to make family life as safe and stable as possible for the children they represent.  In addition to the staff attorneys, the CLC utilizes a mental health professional to appropriately address any mental health issues.  The services offered by the Children’s Law Center ensure that many children who might not have a voice, will be heard.

Attorney Pamela Magnano sits on the board of directors of the Children's Law Center.  Attorney James Flaherty and Flaherty Leagl Group support the Children's Law Center and it work in advocating for children.
Attorney Pamela Magnano
In addition to representation, the CLC also runs the Families In Transitions program.  This program is a mediation program that provides conflict resolution to parents with custody and parenting disputes.  This program is one of the only programs affordable to low income families in need of assistance.  The program utilizes a male/female team approach with an attorney and a mental health professional.  Both Attorney Magnano and Attorney Sandi Girolamo are volunteer mediators with this program.

The CLC also offers the Law Line, which is a legal resource for any person who needs assistance with legal issues relating to children regardless of income level.  The Law Line provides an invaluable resource to those who do not know how to maneuver the Court system and may need guidance.

Lastly, the CLC actively participates in ongoing advocacy efforts at the state level for issues involving children.

2013 marks the 20th Anniversary for the CLC and the CLC has many different events being planned to celebrate this momentous occasion.  Please check back with us to learn more about these events.

Attorney Pamela M. Magnano practices Divorce and Family Law at Flaherty Legal Group in West Hartford, CT with Attorneys Sandi B. Girolamo and James T. Flaherty.